| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <m2m7qytrlhdvht7ro6hee2msi2bd5j733yagdakyjfxi2su46i@nj77lj3ulqp7>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 10:45:18 -0700
From: Vanshidhar Konda <vanshikonda@...amperecomputing.com>
To: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@...ux.microsoft.com>
Cc: Jarred White <jarredwhite@...ux.microsoft.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ACPI: CPPC: Fix access width used for PCC
registers
On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 09:48:28AM -0700, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
>Hi Vanshi,
>
>Thanks for testing and catching this. One comment below, but Jarred is OOF for a couple days so
>we'll get back again after testing on our platform.
>
>On 3/29/2024 3:00 PM, Vanshidhar Konda wrote:
>> Commit 2f4a4d63a193 ("ACPI: CPPC: Use access_width over bit_width for
>> system memory accesses") modified cpc_read/cpc_write to use access_width to
>> read CPC registers. For PCC registers the access width field in the ACPI
>> register macro specifies the PCC subspace id. For non-zero PCC subspace id
>> the access width is incorrectly treated as access width. This causes errors
>> when reading from PCC registers in the CPPC driver.
>>
>> For PCC registers base the size of read/write on the bit width field.
>> The debug message in cpc_read/cpc_write is updated to print relevant
>> information for the address space type used to read the register.
>>
>> Fixes: 2f4a4d63a193 ("ACPI: CPPC: Use access_width over bit_width for system memory accesses")
>> Signed-off-by: Vanshidhar Konda <vanshikonda@...amperecomputing.com>
>> ---
>>
>> When testing v6.9-rc1 kernel on AmpereOne system dmesg showed that
>> cpufreq policy had failed to initialize on some cores during boot because
>> cpufreq->get() always returned 0. On this system CPPC registers are in PCC
>> subspace index 2 that are 32 bits wide. With this patch the CPPC driver
>> interpreted the access width field as 16 bits, causing the register read
>> to roll over too quickly to provide valid values during frequency
>> computation.
>>
>> drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
>> index 4bfbe55553f4..23d16a1ee878 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
>> @@ -1002,14 +1002,14 @@ static int cpc_read(int cpu, struct cpc_register_resource *reg_res, u64 *val)
>> }
>>
>> *val = 0;
>> + size = GET_BIT_WIDTH(reg);
>>
>> if (reg->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO) {
>> - u32 width = GET_BIT_WIDTH(reg);
>> u32 val_u32;
>> acpi_status status;
>>
>> status = acpi_os_read_port((acpi_io_address)reg->address,
>> - &val_u32, width);
>> + &val_u32, size);
>> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
>> pr_debug("Error: Failed to read SystemIO port %llx\n",
>> reg->address);
>> @@ -1018,8 +1018,15 @@ static int cpc_read(int cpu, struct cpc_register_resource *reg_res, u64 *val)
>>
>> *val = val_u32;
>> return 0;
>> - } else if (reg->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_PLATFORM_COMM && pcc_ss_id >= 0)
>> + } else if (reg->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_PLATFORM_COMM && pcc_ss_id >= 0) {
>> + /*
>> + * For registers in PCC space, the register size is determined
>> + * by the bit width field; the access size is used to indicate
>> + * the PCC subspace id.
>> + */
>> + size = reg->bit_width;
>> vaddr = GET_PCC_VADDR(reg->address, pcc_ss_id);
>> + }
>> else if (reg->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY)
>> vaddr = reg_res->sys_mem_vaddr;
>> else if (reg->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_FIXED_HARDWARE)
>> @@ -1028,8 +1035,6 @@ static int cpc_read(int cpu, struct cpc_register_resource *reg_res, u64 *val)
>> return acpi_os_read_memory((acpi_physical_address)reg->address,
>> val, reg->bit_width);
>>
>> - size = GET_BIT_WIDTH(reg);
>> -
>> switch (size) {
>> case 8:
>> *val = readb_relaxed(vaddr);
>> @@ -1044,8 +1049,13 @@ static int cpc_read(int cpu, struct cpc_register_resource *reg_res, u64 *val)
>> *val = readq_relaxed(vaddr);
>> break;
>> default:
>> - pr_debug("Error: Cannot read %u bit width from PCC for ss: %d\n",
>> + if (reg->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY) {
>> + pr_debug("Error: Cannot read %u width from for system memory: 0x%llx\n",
>> + reg->bit_width, reg->address);
>> + } else if (reg->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_PLATFORM_COMM) {
>> + pr_debug("Error: Cannot read %u bit width to PCC for ss: %d\n",
>> reg->bit_width, pcc_ss_id);
>> + }
>> return -EFAULT;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -1063,12 +1073,13 @@ static int cpc_write(int cpu, struct cpc_register_resource *reg_res, u64 val)
>> int pcc_ss_id = per_cpu(cpu_pcc_subspace_idx, cpu);
>> struct cpc_reg *reg = ®_res->cpc_entry.reg;
>>
>> + size = GET_BIT_WIDTH(reg);
>> +
>> if (reg->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO) {
>> - u32 width = GET_BIT_WIDTH(reg);
>> acpi_status status;
>>
>> status = acpi_os_write_port((acpi_io_address)reg->address,
>> - (u32)val, width);
>> + (u32)val, size);
>> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
>> pr_debug("Error: Failed to write SystemIO port %llx\n",
>> reg->address);
>> @@ -1076,8 +1087,15 @@ static int cpc_write(int cpu, struct cpc_register_resource *reg_res, u64 val)
>> }
>>
>> return 0;
>> - } else if (reg->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_PLATFORM_COMM && pcc_ss_id >= 0)
>> + } else if (reg->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_PLATFORM_COMM && pcc_ss_id >= 0) {
>> + /*
>> + * For registers in PCC space, the register size is determined
>> + * by the bit width field; the access size is used to indicate
>> + * the PCC subspace id.
>> + */
>> + size = reg->bit_width;
>> vaddr = GET_PCC_VADDR(reg->address, pcc_ss_id);
>> + }
>> else if (reg->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY)
>> vaddr = reg_res->sys_mem_vaddr;
>> else if (reg->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_FIXED_HARDWARE)
>> @@ -1086,8 +1104,6 @@ static int cpc_write(int cpu, struct cpc_register_resource *reg_res, u64 val)
>> return acpi_os_write_memory((acpi_physical_address)reg->address,
>> val, reg->bit_width);
>>
>> - size = GET_BIT_WIDTH(reg);
>> -
>> if (reg->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY)
>> val = MASK_VAL(reg, val);
>>
>> @@ -1105,8 +1121,13 @@ static int cpc_write(int cpu, struct cpc_register_resource *reg_res, u64 val)
>> writeq_relaxed(val, vaddr);
>> break;
>> default:
>> - pr_debug("Error: Cannot write %u bit width to PCC for ss: %d\n",
>> + if (reg->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY) {
>> + pr_debug("Error: Cannot write %u width from for system memory: 0x%llx\n",
>> + reg->bit_width, reg->address);
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>Shouldn't this be size = GET_BIT_WIDTH(reg) instead of reg->bit_width? I think this is falling back to the
>previous behavior where it assumes access_width was not provided by the platform firmware.
>
That makes sense. I'll replace this in both read/write for the
SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY in the next version. I can send the next version
after you've a chance to test this.
Thanks,
Vanshi
>> + } else if (reg->space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_PLATFORM_COMM) {
>> + pr_debug("Error: Cannot write %u bit width to PCC for ss: %d\n",
>> reg->bit_width, pcc_ss_id);
>> + }
>> ret_val = -EFAULT;
>> break;
>> }
>
>
>Thanks,
>Easwar
Powered by blists - more mailing lists