| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20240401192239.33942-1-piotrwejman90@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 21:22:39 +0200
From: Piotr Wejman <piotrwejman90@...il.com>
To: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Piotr Wejman <piotrwejman90@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4] net: stmmac: fix rx queue priority assignment
The driver should ensure that same priority is not mapped to multiple
rx queues. From DesignWare Cores Ethernet Quality-of-Service
Databook, section 17.1.29 MAC_RxQ_Ctrl2:
"[...]The software must ensure that the content of this field is
mutually exclusive to the PSRQ fields for other queues, that is,
the same priority is not mapped to multiple Rx queues[...]"
Previously rx_queue_priority() function was:
- clearing all priorities from a queue
- adding new priorities to that queue
After this patch it will:
- first assign new priorities to a queue
- then remove those priorities from all other queues
- keep other priorities previously assigned to that queue
Fixes: a8f5102af2a7 ("net: stmmac: TX and RX queue priority configuration")
Fixes: 2142754f8b9c ("net: stmmac: Add MAC related callbacks for XGMAC2")
Signed-off-by: Piotr Wejman <piotrwejman90@...il.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Add some comments
- Apply same changes to dwxgmac2_rx_queue_prio()
- Revert "Rename prio argument to prio_mask"
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240219102405.32015-1-piotrwejman90@gmail.com/T/#u
Changes in v3:
- Fix trailing whitespace
- Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240226093144.31965-1-piotrwejman90@gmail.com/
Changes in v4:
- amend comment and commit message
- Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240303190339.52496-1-piotrwejman90@gmail.com/
.../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c | 40 ++++++++++++++-----
.../ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_core.c | 38 ++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c
index 6b6d0de09619..eb2d0976d010 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac4_core.c
@@ -92,19 +92,41 @@ static void dwmac4_rx_queue_priority(struct mac_device_info *hw,
u32 prio, u32 queue)
{
void __iomem *ioaddr = hw->pcsr;
- u32 base_register;
- u32 value;
+ u32 clear_mask = 0;
+ u32 ctrl2, ctrl3;
+ int i;
- base_register = (queue < 4) ? GMAC_RXQ_CTRL2 : GMAC_RXQ_CTRL3;
- if (queue >= 4)
- queue -= 4;
+ ctrl2 = readl(ioaddr + GMAC_RXQ_CTRL2);
+ ctrl3 = readl(ioaddr + GMAC_RXQ_CTRL3);
- value = readl(ioaddr + base_register);
+ /* The software must ensure that the same priority
+ * is not mapped to multiple Rx queues
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
+ clear_mask |= ((prio << GMAC_RXQCTRL_PSRQX_SHIFT(i)) &
+ GMAC_RXQCTRL_PSRQX_MASK(i));
+
+ ctrl2 &= ~clear_mask;
+ ctrl3 &= ~clear_mask;
+
+ /* First assign new priorities to a queue, then
+ * clear them from others queues
+ */
+ if (queue < 4) {
+ ctrl2 |= (prio << GMAC_RXQCTRL_PSRQX_SHIFT(queue)) &
+ GMAC_RXQCTRL_PSRQX_MASK(queue);
- value &= ~GMAC_RXQCTRL_PSRQX_MASK(queue);
- value |= (prio << GMAC_RXQCTRL_PSRQX_SHIFT(queue)) &
+ writel(ctrl2, ioaddr + GMAC_RXQ_CTRL2);
+ writel(ctrl3, ioaddr + GMAC_RXQ_CTRL3);
+ } else {
+ queue -= 4;
+
+ ctrl3 |= (prio << GMAC_RXQCTRL_PSRQX_SHIFT(queue)) &
GMAC_RXQCTRL_PSRQX_MASK(queue);
- writel(value, ioaddr + base_register);
+
+ writel(ctrl3, ioaddr + GMAC_RXQ_CTRL3);
+ writel(ctrl2, ioaddr + GMAC_RXQ_CTRL2);
+ }
}
static void dwmac4_tx_queue_priority(struct mac_device_info *hw,
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_core.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_core.c
index 1af2f89a0504..2bc05173884e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_core.c
@@ -105,17 +105,41 @@ static void dwxgmac2_rx_queue_prio(struct mac_device_info *hw, u32 prio,
u32 queue)
{
void __iomem *ioaddr = hw->pcsr;
- u32 value, reg;
+ u32 clear_mask = 0;
+ u32 ctrl2, ctrl3;
+ int i;
- reg = (queue < 4) ? XGMAC_RXQ_CTRL2 : XGMAC_RXQ_CTRL3;
- if (queue >= 4)
+ ctrl2 = readl(ioaddr + XGMAC_RXQ_CTRL2);
+ ctrl3 = readl(ioaddr + XGMAC_RXQ_CTRL3);
+
+ /* The software must ensure that the same priority
+ * is not mapped to multiple Rx queues
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
+ clear_mask |= ((prio << XGMAC_PSRQ_SHIFT(i)) &
+ XGMAC_PSRQ(i));
+
+ ctrl2 &= ~clear_mask;
+ ctrl3 &= ~clear_mask;
+
+ /* First assign new priorities to a queue, then
+ * clear them from others queues
+ */
+ if (queue < 4) {
+ ctrl2 |= (prio << XGMAC_PSRQ_SHIFT(queue)) &
+ XGMAC_PSRQ(queue);
+
+ writel(ctrl2, ioaddr + XGMAC_RXQ_CTRL2);
+ writel(ctrl3, ioaddr + XGMAC_RXQ_CTRL3);
+ } else {
queue -= 4;
- value = readl(ioaddr + reg);
- value &= ~XGMAC_PSRQ(queue);
- value |= (prio << XGMAC_PSRQ_SHIFT(queue)) & XGMAC_PSRQ(queue);
+ ctrl3 |= (prio << XGMAC_PSRQ_SHIFT(queue)) &
+ XGMAC_PSRQ(queue);
- writel(value, ioaddr + reg);
+ writel(ctrl3, ioaddr + XGMAC_RXQ_CTRL3);
+ writel(ctrl2, ioaddr + XGMAC_RXQ_CTRL2);
+ }
}
static void dwxgmac2_tx_queue_prio(struct mac_device_info *hw, u32 prio,
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists