linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: init_mlocked_on_free

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJj2-QEzUjUP4kp9A-XGyjWzd9ZPmchRqYNZaw5AeYEoB7Z-Og@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 15:34:56 -0700
From: Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@...gle.com>
To: York Jasper Niebuhr <yjnworkstation@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	willy@...radead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: init_mlocked_on_free_v3

On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 7:56 AM York Jasper Niebuhr
<yjnworkstation@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Implements the "init_mlocked_on_free" boot option. When this boot option
> is enabled, any mlock'ed pages are zeroed on free. If
> the pages are munlock'ed beforehand, no initialization takes place.
> This boot option is meant to combat the performance hit of
> "init_on_free" as reported in commit 6471384af2a6 ("mm: security:
> introduce init_on_alloc=1 and init_on_free=1 boot options"). With
I understand the intent of the init_on_alloc and init_on_free options,
but what's the idea behind special-casing on mlock?
Is the idea that mlocking implies something other than "preventing
memory from being swapped out"?

> "init_mlocked_on_free=1" only relevant data is freed while everything
> else is left untouched by the kernel. Correspondingly, this patch
> introduces no performance hit for unmapping non-mlock'ed memory. The
> unmapping overhead for purely mlocked memory was measured to be
> approximately 13%. Realistically, most systems mlock only a fraction of
> the total memory so the real-world system overhead should be close to
> zero.
>
> Optimally, userspace programs clear any key material or other
> confidential memory before exit and munlock the according memory
> regions. If a program crashes, userspace key managers fail to do this
> job. Accordingly, no munlock operations are performed so the data is
> caught and zeroed by the kernel. Should the program not crash, all
> memory will ideally be munlocked so no overhead is caused.
>
> CONFIG_INIT_MLOCKED_ON_FREE_DEFAULT_ON can be set to enable
> "init_mlocked_on_free" by default.
>
> Signed-off-by: York Jasper Niebuhr <yjnworkstation@...il.com>
FYI, git format-patch takes a -v parameter to specify the version of
the patch series. and scripts/checkpatch.pl should catch some of the
formatting and style issues.

I also accidentally forgot to reply all, sorry about the noise York.

Thanks,
Yuanchu Xie