[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zgs5NxoUUoGIkuQO@pavilion.home>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 00:46:15 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Cc: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>, oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev,
lkp@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, ying.huang@...el.com,
feng.tang@...el.com, fengwei.yin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [linus:master] [timers] 7ee9887703:
stress-ng.uprobe.ops_per_sec -17.1% regression
Le Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 04:39:17PM +0800, kernel test robot a écrit :
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
> we reported
> "[tip:timers/core] [timers] 7ee9887703: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -1.2% regression"
> in
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/202403011511.24defbbd-oliver.sang@intel.com/
>
> now we noticed this commit is in mainline and we captured further results.
>
> still include netperf results for complete. below details FYI.
>
>
> kernel test robot noticed a -17.1% regression of stress-ng.uprobe.ops_per_sec
> on:
The good news is that I can reproduce.
It has made me spot something already:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZgsynV536q1L17IS@pavilion.home/T/#m28c37a943fdbcbadf0332cf9c32c350c74c403b0
But that's not enough to fix the regression. Investigation continues...
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists