linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] fuse: allow FUSE drivers to declare themselves free from outside changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJfpeguWCNDzAuDndB8pbcai5c+ux3KLtrAaAOuh74+wCtZBXA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 16:54:17 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Cc: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>, Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@...tmail.fm>, 
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fuse: allow FUSE drivers to declare themselves free
 from outside changes

On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 at 16:51, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> I'm fine with whatever verbiage you prefer. Let me know if you need me
> to resend.

I'll do this, no need to resend.

> Another thing to consider: what about fsnotify? Should notifications be
> allowed when this flag isn't set?

Aren't local notification done for all network filesystems?

Thanks,
Miklos