lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 19:33:24 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
Cc: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@...cle.com>,
	Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
	Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, error27@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drm/panthor: Fix couple of NULL vs IS_ERR() bugs

On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 05:19:25PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 17:44:18 +0300
> Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 04:38:38PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > > On Tue,  2 Apr 2024 07:14:11 -0700
> > > Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@...cle.com> wrote:
> > >   
> > > > Currently panthor_vm_get_heap_pool() returns both ERR_PTR() and
> > > > NULL(when create is false and if there is no poool attached to the  
> > > 
> > >                                                ^ pool
> > >   
> > > > VM)
> > > > 	- Change the function to return error pointers, when pool is
> > > > 	  NULL return -ENOENT
> > > > 	- Also handle the callers to check for IS_ERR() on failure.
> > > > 
> > > > Fixes: 4bdca1150792 ("drm/panthor: Add the driver frontend block")  
> > > 
> > > I would explain that the code was correct, but the documentation didn't
> > > match the function behavior, otherwise it feels a bit weird to have a
> > > Fixes tag here.  
> > 
> > The code wasn't correct, it returned a mix of error pointers and NULL.
> 
> AFAICT, this is allowed, otherwise why would we have IS_ERR_OR_NULL().

Yep.  I have written a blog about this:
https://staticthinking.wordpress.com/2022/08/01/mixing-error-pointers-and-null/

> The fact smatch can't see through panthor_vm_get_heap_pool() and detect
> that the return value is different for create=false/true doesn't mean
> the code was wrong. I'm certainly not saying this is a good thing to
> have a function that encodes the error case with two different kind of
> return value, but I wouldn't qualify it as a bug either. What's
> incorrect though, is the fact the documentation doesn't match the code.
> 
> > So it needs a Fixes tag.
> 
> I didn't say we should drop the Fixes tag, but the bug being fixed here
> is a mismatch between the doc and the implementation, the code itself
> was correct, and the behavior is actually unchanged with this patch
> applied, it's just done in a less confusing way.

Oh.  Sorry, I haven't been following this thread closely and I misread
the code as well.  You're right that the code works.  In this case, I
would say actually that it does not need a Fixes tag because it's not
a bug.  It's just a cleanup.

Sorry for the noise.

regards,
dan carpenter


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ