[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <73c6012f-adb0-470b-bd47-6093d28aea97@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 18:21:55 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] KVM: arm64: Add newly allocated ID registers to
register descriptions
On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 11:59:06AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> > The 2023 architecture extensions have allocated some new ID registers, add
> > them to the KVM system register descriptions so that they are visible to
> > guests.
> > We make the newly introduced dpISA features writeable, as well as
> > allowing writes to ID_AA64ISAR3_EL1.CPA for FEAT_CPA which only
> > introduces straigforward new instructions with no additional
> > architectural state or traps.
> FPMR actively gets trapped by HCRX_EL2.
Sure, I'm not clear what you're trying to say here? The "no additional"
bit is referring to FEAT_CPA.
> > - ID_UNALLOCATED(6,3),
> > + ID_WRITABLE(ID_AA64ISAR3_EL1, ~(ID_AA64ISAR2_EL1_RES0 |
> > + ID_AA64ISAR3_EL1_PACM |
> > + ID_AA64ISAR3_EL1_TLBIW)),
> > ID_UNALLOCATED(6,4),
> > ID_UNALLOCATED(6,5),
> > ID_UNALLOCATED(6,6),
> Where is the code that enforces the lack of support for MTEFAR,
> MTESTOREONLY, and MTEPERM for SCTLR_ELx, EnPACM and EnFPM in HCRX_EL2?
Could you please be more explicit regarding what you're expecting to see
here? Other than the writeability mask for the ID register I would have
expected to need explicit code to enable new features rather than
explicit code to keep currently unsupported features unsupported. I'm
sure what you're referencing will be obvious once I see it but I'm
drawing a blank.
> And I haven't checked whether TLBI VMALLWS2 can be trapped.
I didn't see anything but I might not be aware of where to look, there
doesn't seem to be anything for that specifically in HFGITR_EL2 or
HFGITR2_EL2 which would be the main places I'd expect to find something.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists