[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b3229336ecdcba1adbca4a3392e5726c418647ad.camel@microchip.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 03:38:33 +0000
From: <Arun.Ramadoss@...rochip.com>
To: <andrew@...n.ch>, <olteanv@...il.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
<edumazet@...gle.com>, <f.fainelli@...il.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: <kernel@...gutronix.de>, <dsahern@...nel.org>, <san@...v.dk>,
<willemb@...gle.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <horms@...nel.org>, <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 7/9] net: dsa: microchip: enable ETS support
for KSZ989X variants
Hi Oleksij,
On Thu, 2024-03-28 at 17:05 +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you
> know the content is safe
>
> I tested ETS support on KSZ9893, so it should work other KSZ989X
> variants too.
You have enabled ETS for KSZ9897, KSZ9896, KSZ9893. There are other
switches similar to KSZ9893,
KSZ9563 - Same as KSZ9893 but with PTP capability
KSZ8563 - Same as KSZ9563 but without gigabit
KSZ9567 - Same as KSZ9897 but with PTP capability
KSZ8567 - Same as KSZ9567 but without gigabit
Do we need enable ETS for those switches also.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists