[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0643e9d2-3799-4b6b-81fa-fe516e850f72@ghiti.fr>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 11:41:17 +0200
From: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>
To: Ben Zong-You Xie <ben717@...estech.com>, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
irogers@...gle.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
palmer@...belt.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: dylan@...estech.com, tim609@...estech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix the warnings in the 32-bit platform
Hi Ben,
On 05/03/2024 13:04, Ben Zong-You Xie wrote:
> This series fix two incompatible type warnings when building perf in the
> 32-bit platform.
>
> Ben Zong-You Xie (2):
> perf daemon: Fix the warning about time_t
> perf riscv: Fix the warning due to the incompatible type
>
> tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/header.c | 2 +-
> tools/perf/builtin-daemon.c | 9 +++++----
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
For the series, you can add:
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>
To me this should go into -fixes, but which tree? perf or riscv?
Thanks,
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists