linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/19] amba: store owner from modules with amba_driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZgvaFNLTqgQrPeiO@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 11:12:36 +0100
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
	Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
	James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
	Olivia Mackall <olivia@...enic.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
	Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>,
	Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/19] amba: store owner from modules with
 amba_driver_register()

On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 12:04:07PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> You brought no argument for keeping the kernel-version-header
> requirement nowadays, yet you call me of not working constructively. I

So add inability to read to your failings, because I _did_ state that
_I_ still _use_ it.

End of discussion, I'm not engaging with you in your current
confrontational mood where you clearly don't want to understand
anything (or intentionally misinterpreting) I'm writing - making it
pointless to continue.

I even think you're intentionally misinterpreting the responses
from the patch system.

Overall, I can only draw the conclusion that you are playing politics
and want the patch system gone, and you want me to use "standard"
tooling that will _increase_ the amount of effort I need to put in.
No, that's not going to happen.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!