[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <94f7ec98-4219-46cd-ac6c-8177a0bc37ce@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 13:00:58 +0200
From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
To: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
CC: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>, "Andy
Shevchenko" <andy@...nel.org>, <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
<ntfs3@...ts.linux.dev>, Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@...el.com>, "Ido
Schimmel" <idosch@...dia.com>, Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
<dm-devel@...hat.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jiri Pirko
<jiri@...nulli.us>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Marcin Szycik
<marcin.szycik@...ux.intel.com>, Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Przemek Kitszel
<przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>, Michal Swiatkowski
<michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
<linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>, <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v5 00/21] ice: add PFCP filter
support
From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 12:59:19 +0200
> On Mon, 2024-02-12 at 12:35 +0100, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
>> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
>> Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 07:05:35 -0800
>>
>>> On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 13:46:44 +0100 Alexander Lobakin wrote:
>>>>> Add support for creating PFCP filters in switchdev mode. Add pfcp module
>>>>> that allows to create a PFCP-type netdev. The netdev then can be passed to
>>>>> tc when creating a filter to indicate that PFCP filter should be created.
>>>>
>>>> I believe folks agreed that bitmap_{read,write}() should stay inline,
>>>> ping then?
>>>
>>> Well, Dave dropped this from PW, again. Can you ping people to give you
>>
>> Why was it dropped? :D
>>
>>> the acks and repost? What's your plan?
>>
>> Ufff, I thought people read their emails...
>>
>> Yury, Konstantin, s390 folks? Could you please give some missing acks? I
>> don't want to ping everyone privately :z
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Olek
>>
>
> I do see an Acked-by from Peter Oberparleiter for the s390/cio bit, so
> as far as I can tell the s390 part has all Acks necessary, no?
The series was already taken to net-next :D
>
> Thanks,
> Niklas
Thanks,
Olek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists