[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZgyzxmuMIK87C2nW@dragon>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 09:41:26 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo2@...h.net>
To: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com>,
Philippe Schenker <philippe.schenker@...adex.com>,
Max Krummenacher <max.krummenacher@...adex.com>,
Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>,
Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] arm64: dts: imx8-ss-lsio: fix pwm lpcg indices
On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 11:09:17AM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 08:04:56PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 7:25 PM Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com> wrote:
> > >
> > > lpcg's arg0 should use clock indices instead of index.
> > >
> > > pwm0_lpcg: clock-controller@...00000 {
> > > ... // Col1 Col2
> > > clocks = <&clk IMX_SC_R_PWM_0 IMX_SC_PM_CLK_PER>, // 0 0
> > > <&clk IMX_SC_R_PWM_0 IMX_SC_PM_CLK_PER>, // 1 1
> > > <&clk IMX_SC_R_PWM_0 IMX_SC_PM_CLK_PER>, // 2 4
> > > <&lsio_bus_clk>, // 3 5
> > > <&clk IMX_SC_R_PWM_0 IMX_SC_PM_CLK_PER>; // 4 6
> > > clock-indices = <IMX_LPCG_CLK_0>, <IMX_LPCG_CLK_1>,
> > > <IMX_LPCG_CLK_4>, <IMX_LPCG_CLK_5>,
> > > <IMX_LPCG_CLK_6>;
> > > };
> > >
> > > Col1: index, which exited dts try to get.
> >
> > I cannot understand this sentence, sorry.
>
> This base on downstream dts code. Downstream code use index in 'Col1' to
> get clock.
So s/exited/existing you meant?
Shawn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists