| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <bfa2b91f-a347-450c-8558-5c8f1fae3fe0@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 23:06:13 -0400
From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
To: John Allen <john.allen@....com>, bp@...en8.de,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, tony.luck@...el.com
Cc: yazen.ghannam@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
avadhut.naik@....com, muralidhara.mk@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] RAS/AMD/ATL: Validate address map when information
is gathered
On 3/27/24 14:52, John Allen wrote:
> The address map will not change during translation so all checks to
> validate the map can be moved to a single function that checks the map
> at the time the information is gathered.
There needs to be an command in the message (imperative mood).
"Validate maps earlier..." or similar.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Allen <john.allen@....com>
> ---
> v2:
> - New in v2.
> ---
> drivers/ras/amd/atl/dehash.c | 43 --------------
> drivers/ras/amd/atl/map.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ras/amd/atl/dehash.c b/drivers/ras/amd/atl/dehash.c
> index 4ea46262c4f5..d4ee7ecabaee 100644
> --- a/drivers/ras/amd/atl/dehash.c
> +++ b/drivers/ras/amd/atl/dehash.c
> @@ -12,41 +12,10 @@
>
> #include "internal.h"
>
> -/*
> - * Verify the interleave bits are correct in the different interleaving
> - * settings.
> - *
> - * If @num_intlv_dies and/or @num_intlv_sockets are 1, it means the
> - * respective interleaving is disabled.
> - */
> -static inline bool map_bits_valid(struct addr_ctx *ctx, u8 bit1, u8 bit2,
> - u8 num_intlv_dies, u8 num_intlv_sockets)
> -{
> - if (!(ctx->map.intlv_bit_pos == bit1 || ctx->map.intlv_bit_pos == bit2)) {
> - pr_debug("Invalid interleave bit: %u", ctx->map.intlv_bit_pos);
> - return false;
> - }
> -
> - if (ctx->map.num_intlv_dies > num_intlv_dies) {
> - pr_debug("Invalid number of interleave dies: %u", ctx->map.num_intlv_dies);
> - return false;
> - }
> -
> - if (ctx->map.num_intlv_sockets > num_intlv_sockets) {
> - pr_debug("Invalid number of interleave sockets: %u", ctx->map.num_intlv_sockets);
> - return false;
> - }
> -
> - return true;
> -}
> -
> static int df2_dehash_addr(struct addr_ctx *ctx)
> {
> u8 hashed_bit, intlv_bit, intlv_bit_pos;
>
> - if (!map_bits_valid(ctx, 8, 9, 1, 1))
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> intlv_bit_pos = ctx->map.intlv_bit_pos;
> intlv_bit = !!(BIT_ULL(intlv_bit_pos) & ctx->ret_addr);
>
> @@ -67,9 +36,6 @@ static int df3_dehash_addr(struct addr_ctx *ctx)
> bool hash_ctl_64k, hash_ctl_2M, hash_ctl_1G;
> u8 hashed_bit, intlv_bit, intlv_bit_pos;
>
> - if (!map_bits_valid(ctx, 8, 9, 1, 1))
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> hash_ctl_64k = FIELD_GET(DF3_HASH_CTL_64K, ctx->map.ctl);
> hash_ctl_2M = FIELD_GET(DF3_HASH_CTL_2M, ctx->map.ctl);
> hash_ctl_1G = FIELD_GET(DF3_HASH_CTL_1G, ctx->map.ctl);
> @@ -171,9 +137,6 @@ static int df4_dehash_addr(struct addr_ctx *ctx)
> bool hash_ctl_64k, hash_ctl_2M, hash_ctl_1G;
> u8 hashed_bit, intlv_bit;
>
> - if (!map_bits_valid(ctx, 8, 8, 1, 2))
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> hash_ctl_64k = FIELD_GET(DF4_HASH_CTL_64K, ctx->map.ctl);
> hash_ctl_2M = FIELD_GET(DF4_HASH_CTL_2M, ctx->map.ctl);
> hash_ctl_1G = FIELD_GET(DF4_HASH_CTL_1G, ctx->map.ctl);
> @@ -247,9 +210,6 @@ static int df4p5_dehash_addr(struct addr_ctx *ctx)
> u8 hashed_bit, intlv_bit;
> u64 rehash_vector;
>
> - if (!map_bits_valid(ctx, 8, 8, 1, 2))
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> hash_ctl_64k = FIELD_GET(DF4_HASH_CTL_64K, ctx->map.ctl);
> hash_ctl_2M = FIELD_GET(DF4_HASH_CTL_2M, ctx->map.ctl);
> hash_ctl_1G = FIELD_GET(DF4_HASH_CTL_1G, ctx->map.ctl);
> @@ -360,9 +320,6 @@ static int mi300_dehash_addr(struct addr_ctx *ctx)
> bool hashed_bit, intlv_bit, test_bit;
> u8 num_intlv_bits, base_bit, i;
>
> - if (!map_bits_valid(ctx, 8, 8, 4, 1))
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> hash_ctl_4k = FIELD_GET(DF4p5_HASH_CTL_4K, ctx->map.ctl);
> hash_ctl_64k = FIELD_GET(DF4_HASH_CTL_64K, ctx->map.ctl);
> hash_ctl_2M = FIELD_GET(DF4_HASH_CTL_2M, ctx->map.ctl);
> diff --git a/drivers/ras/amd/atl/map.c b/drivers/ras/amd/atl/map.c
> index 8b908e8d7495..c7772733a363 100644
> --- a/drivers/ras/amd/atl/map.c
> +++ b/drivers/ras/amd/atl/map.c
> @@ -642,6 +642,107 @@ static int get_global_map_data(struct addr_ctx *ctx)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Verify the interleave bits are correct in the different interleaving
> + * settings.
> + *
> + * If @num_intlv_dies and/or @num_intlv_sockets are 1, it means the
> + * respective interleaving is disabled.
> + */
> +inline bool map_bits_valid(struct addr_ctx *ctx, u8 bit1, u8 bit2,
Missing "static" keyword.
> + u8 num_intlv_dies, u8 num_intlv_sockets)
> +{
> + if (!(ctx->map.intlv_bit_pos == bit1 || ctx->map.intlv_bit_pos == bit2)) {
> + pr_debug("Invalid interleave bit: %u", ctx->map.intlv_bit_pos);
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + if (ctx->map.num_intlv_dies > num_intlv_dies) {
> + pr_debug("Invalid number of interleave dies: %u", ctx->map.num_intlv_dies);
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + if (ctx->map.num_intlv_sockets > num_intlv_sockets) {
> + pr_debug("Invalid number of interleave sockets: %u", ctx->map.num_intlv_sockets);
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static int validate_address_map(struct addr_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> + switch (ctx->map.intlv_mode) {
> + case DF2_2CHAN_HASH:
> + if (!map_bits_valid(ctx, 8, 9, 1, 1))
> + goto out;
> + break;
> +
> + case DF3_COD4_2CHAN_HASH:
> + case DF3_COD2_4CHAN_HASH:
> + case DF3_COD1_8CHAN_HASH:
> + if (!map_bits_valid(ctx, 8, 9, 1, 1))
> + goto out;
> + break;
> +
> + case DF4_NPS4_2CHAN_HASH:
> + case DF4_NPS2_4CHAN_HASH:
> + case DF4_NPS1_8CHAN_HASH:
> + if (!map_bits_valid(ctx, 8, 8, 1, 2))
> + goto out;
> + break;
> +
> + case DF4p5_NPS4_2CHAN_1K_HASH:
> + case DF4p5_NPS4_2CHAN_2K_HASH:
> + case DF4p5_NPS2_4CHAN_1K_HASH:
> + case DF4p5_NPS2_4CHAN_2K_HASH:
> + case DF4p5_NPS1_8CHAN_1K_HASH:
> + case DF4p5_NPS1_8CHAN_2K_HASH:
> + case DF4p5_NPS1_16CHAN_1K_HASH:
> + case DF4p5_NPS1_16CHAN_2K_HASH:
> + if (!map_bits_valid(ctx, 8, 8, 1, 2))
> + goto out;
> + break;
> +
> + case DF4p5_NPS4_3CHAN_1K_HASH:
> + case DF4p5_NPS4_3CHAN_2K_HASH:
> + case DF4p5_NPS2_5CHAN_1K_HASH:
> + case DF4p5_NPS2_5CHAN_2K_HASH:
> + case DF4p5_NPS2_6CHAN_1K_HASH:
> + case DF4p5_NPS2_6CHAN_2K_HASH:
> + case DF4p5_NPS1_10CHAN_1K_HASH:
> + case DF4p5_NPS1_10CHAN_2K_HASH:
> + case DF4p5_NPS1_12CHAN_1K_HASH:
> + case DF4p5_NPS1_12CHAN_2K_HASH:
> + if (ctx->map.num_intlv_sockets != 1 || !map_bits_valid(ctx, 8, 0, 1, 1))
> + goto out;
> + break;
> +
> + case DF4p5_NPS0_24CHAN_1K_HASH:
> + case DF4p5_NPS0_24CHAN_2K_HASH:
> + if (ctx->map.num_intlv_sockets < 2 || !map_bits_valid(ctx, 8, 0, 1, 2))
> + goto out;
> + break;
Please move the new DF4p5 np2 cases to the next patch. This patch can
then just be rearranging the existing code. And the next patch can add
new code.
> +
> + case MI3_HASH_8CHAN:
> + case MI3_HASH_16CHAN:
> + case MI3_HASH_32CHAN:
> + if (!map_bits_valid(ctx, 8, 8, 4, 1))
> + goto out;
> + break;
> +
> + default:
> + atl_debug_on_bad_intlv_mode(ctx);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +out:
> + atl_debug(ctx, "Inconsistent address map");
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> static void dump_address_map(struct dram_addr_map *map)
> {
> u8 i;
> @@ -678,5 +779,9 @@ int get_address_map(struct addr_ctx *ctx)
>
> dump_address_map(&ctx->map);
>
> + ret = validate_address_map(ctx);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> return ret;
> }
Thanks,
Yazen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists