[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ae27aa5a-4c34-46dd-b139-3017729e2c1f@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 11:10:37 -0400
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>, Alex Shi <alexs@...nel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Barry Song <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cgroup/cpuset: Make cpuset hotplug processing
synchronous
On 4/3/24 10:56, Michal Koutný wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 10:47:33AM -0400, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com> wrote:
>> should be rare these days as it will only apply in the case of cgroup
>> v1 under certain condtion,
> Could the migration be simply omitted it those special cases?
>
> (Tasks remain in cpusets with empty cpusets -- that already happens in
> with the current patch before workqueue is dispatched.)
The tasks should not be runnable if there is no CPUs left in their v1
cpuset. Migrating them to a parent with runnable CPUs is the current way
which I don't want to break. Alternatively, we could force it to fall
back to cgroup v2 behavior using the CPUs in their parent cpuset.
Cheers,
Longman
>
> Michal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists