linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 06/10] perf/dwc_pcie: Avoid placing cpumask on the stack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed,  3 Apr 2024 23:59:46 +0800
From: Dawei Li <dawei.li@...ngroup.cn>
To: will@...nel.org,
	mark.rutland@....com,
	yury.norov@...il.com,
	linux@...musvillemoes.dk
Cc: xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com,
	renyu.zj@...ux.alibaba.com,
	yangyicong@...ilicon.com,
	jonathan.cameron@...wei.com,
	andersson@...nel.org,
	konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	Dawei Li <dawei.li@...ngroup.cn>
Subject: [PATCH v3 06/10] perf/dwc_pcie: Avoid placing cpumask on the stack

In general it's preferable to avoid placing cpumasks on the stack, as
for large values of NR_CPUS these can consume significant amounts of
stack space and make stack overflows more likely.

Use cpumask_any_and_but() to avoid the need for a temporary cpumask on
the stack.

Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@...ngroup.cn>
---
 drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c | 10 ++++------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c
index 957058ad0099..c5e328f23841 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c
@@ -690,9 +690,8 @@ static int dwc_pcie_pmu_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *cpuhp_n
 {
 	struct dwc_pcie_pmu *pcie_pmu;
 	struct pci_dev *pdev;
-	int node;
-	cpumask_t mask;
 	unsigned int target;
+	int node;
 
 	pcie_pmu = hlist_entry_safe(cpuhp_node, struct dwc_pcie_pmu, cpuhp_node);
 	/* Nothing to do if this CPU doesn't own the PMU */
@@ -702,10 +701,9 @@ static int dwc_pcie_pmu_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *cpuhp_n
 	pcie_pmu->on_cpu = -1;
 	pdev = pcie_pmu->pdev;
 	node = dev_to_node(&pdev->dev);
-	if (cpumask_and(&mask, cpumask_of_node(node), cpu_online_mask) &&
-	    cpumask_andnot(&mask, &mask, cpumask_of(cpu)))
-		target = cpumask_any(&mask);
-	else
+
+	target = cpumask_any_and_but(cpumask_of_node(node), cpu_online_mask, cpu);
+	if (target >= nr_cpu_ids)
 		target = cpumask_any_but(cpu_online_mask, cpu);
 
 	if (target >= nr_cpu_ids) {
-- 
2.27.0