linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 09/10] perf/qcom_l2: Avoid placing cpumask on the stack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed,  3 Apr 2024 23:59:49 +0800
From: Dawei Li <dawei.li@...ngroup.cn>
To: will@...nel.org,
	mark.rutland@....com,
	yury.norov@...il.com,
	linux@...musvillemoes.dk
Cc: xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com,
	renyu.zj@...ux.alibaba.com,
	yangyicong@...ilicon.com,
	jonathan.cameron@...wei.com,
	andersson@...nel.org,
	konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	Dawei Li <dawei.li@...ngroup.cn>
Subject: [PATCH v3 09/10] perf/qcom_l2: Avoid placing cpumask on the stack

In general it's preferable to avoid placing cpumasks on the stack, as
for large values of NR_CPUS these can consume significant amounts of
stack space and make stack overflows more likely.

Use cpumask_any_and_but() to avoid the need for a temporary cpumask on
the stack.

Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@...ngroup.cn>
---
 drivers/perf/qcom_l2_pmu.c | 8 +++-----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/perf/qcom_l2_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/qcom_l2_pmu.c
index 148df5ae8ef8..b5a44dc1dc3a 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/qcom_l2_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/qcom_l2_pmu.c
@@ -801,9 +801,8 @@ static int l2cache_pmu_online_cpu(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
 
 static int l2cache_pmu_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
 {
-	struct cluster_pmu *cluster;
 	struct l2cache_pmu *l2cache_pmu;
-	cpumask_t cluster_online_cpus;
+	struct cluster_pmu *cluster;
 	unsigned int target;
 
 	l2cache_pmu = hlist_entry_safe(node, struct l2cache_pmu, node);
@@ -820,9 +819,8 @@ static int l2cache_pmu_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
 	cluster->on_cpu = -1;
 
 	/* Any other CPU for this cluster which is still online */
-	cpumask_and(&cluster_online_cpus, &cluster->cluster_cpus,
-		    cpu_online_mask);
-	target = cpumask_any_but(&cluster_online_cpus, cpu);
+	target = cpumask_any_and_but(&cluster->cluster_cpus,
+				     cpu_online_mask, cpu);
 	if (target >= nr_cpu_ids) {
 		disable_irq(cluster->irq);
 		return 0;
-- 
2.27.0