[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240403155950.2068109-10-dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 23:59:49 +0800
From: Dawei Li <dawei.li@...ngroup.cn>
To: will@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com,
yury.norov@...il.com,
linux@...musvillemoes.dk
Cc: xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com,
renyu.zj@...ux.alibaba.com,
yangyicong@...ilicon.com,
jonathan.cameron@...wei.com,
andersson@...nel.org,
konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Dawei Li <dawei.li@...ngroup.cn>
Subject: [PATCH v3 09/10] perf/qcom_l2: Avoid placing cpumask on the stack
In general it's preferable to avoid placing cpumasks on the stack, as
for large values of NR_CPUS these can consume significant amounts of
stack space and make stack overflows more likely.
Use cpumask_any_and_but() to avoid the need for a temporary cpumask on
the stack.
Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@...ngroup.cn>
---
drivers/perf/qcom_l2_pmu.c | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/perf/qcom_l2_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/qcom_l2_pmu.c
index 148df5ae8ef8..b5a44dc1dc3a 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/qcom_l2_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/qcom_l2_pmu.c
@@ -801,9 +801,8 @@ static int l2cache_pmu_online_cpu(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
static int l2cache_pmu_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
{
- struct cluster_pmu *cluster;
struct l2cache_pmu *l2cache_pmu;
- cpumask_t cluster_online_cpus;
+ struct cluster_pmu *cluster;
unsigned int target;
l2cache_pmu = hlist_entry_safe(node, struct l2cache_pmu, node);
@@ -820,9 +819,8 @@ static int l2cache_pmu_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
cluster->on_cpu = -1;
/* Any other CPU for this cluster which is still online */
- cpumask_and(&cluster_online_cpus, &cluster->cluster_cpus,
- cpu_online_mask);
- target = cpumask_any_but(&cluster_online_cpus, cpu);
+ target = cpumask_any_and_but(&cluster->cluster_cpus,
+ cpu_online_mask, cpu);
if (target >= nr_cpu_ids) {
disable_irq(cluster->irq);
return 0;
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists