[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2d2a22a5-25cf-4b15-904e-7928a92d6ff5@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 09:44:24 -0700
From: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
"open list:HFI1 DRIVER" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
"open list:RADEON and AMDGPU DRM DRIVERS" <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"open list:DRM DRIVERS" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"open list:INTEL DRM DISPLAY FOR XE AND I915 DRIVERS"
<intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"open list:INTEL DRM DISPLAY FOR XE AND I915 DRIVERS"
<intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"open list:DRM DRIVER FOR NVIDIA GEFORCE/QUADRO GPUS"
<nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"open list:I2C SUBSYSTEM HOST DRIVERS" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:BTTV VIDEO4LINUX DRIVER" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:FRAMEBUFFER LAYER" <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v0 01/14] IB/hfi1, IB/qib: Make I2C terminology more
inclusive
On 4/3/2024 8:54 AM, Dennis Dalessandro wrote:
>
> On 4/3/24 4:30 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 05:00:25PM +0000, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
>>> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C specifications have replaced "master/slave"
>>> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's series
>>> to fix drivers/i2c[1], fix the terminology where I had a role to play, now that
>>> the approved verbiage exists in the specification.
>>>
>>> Compile tested, no functionality changes intended
>>>
>>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240322132619.6389-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com/
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@...ux.microsoft.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/chip.c | 6 ++--
>>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/chip.h | 2 +-
>>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/chip_registers.h | 2 +-
>>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/file_ops.c | 2 +-
>>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/firmware.c | 22 ++++++-------
>>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/pcie.c | 2 +-
>>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/qsfp.c | 36 ++++++++++-----------
>>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/user_exp_rcv.c | 2 +-
>>> drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_twsi.c | 6 ++--
>>> 9 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>>
>> hfi1 and qib work perfectly fine with the current terminology. There is
>> no need to change old code just for the sake of change.
>>
>> Let's drop this patch.
>
> Agreed.
Will drop in v1.
Thanks,
Easwar
Powered by blists - more mailing lists