[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjG-V-9USyDTWqUhY7YxEwSfwC9yA7LJkT7uGbHHFZeYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 09:59:36 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...weicloud.com>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org, jack@...e.cz,
paul@...l-moore.com, jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com, zohar@...ux.ibm.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, pc@...guebit.com,
Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>, Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH v3] security: Place security_path_post_mknod()
where the original IMA call was
On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 at 02:10, Roberto Sassu
<roberto.sassu@...weicloud.com> wrote:
>
> Move security_path_post_mknod() where the ima_post_path_mknod() call was,
> which is obviously correct from IMA/EVM perspective. IMA/EVM are the only
> in-kernel users, and only need to inspect regular files.
Thanks, applied,
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists