[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240403175950.GKZg2ZFnCaE1BeRpTQ@fat_crate.local>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 19:59:50 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@....com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86/alternatives: Catch late X86_FEATURE modifiers
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 05:57:01PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> nit: While cleaning this bit mind if you also switch alternatives_patched to
> a bool?
Busy as hell right now. But I take patches ontop. :-)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists