[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+bDH-uTBoPjb+=XQKvb+euo=1swaiZUXOWJbL=zP4i0k8JtPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 14:01:08 -0400
From: Audra Mitchell <audra@...hat.com>
To: "Artem S. Tashkinov" <aros@....com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: workqueue: name exceeds WQ_NAME_LEN. Truncating to: events_freezable_power_efficien
I just pushed a doc patch to fix the references to the old name.
Please let me know if you see something I missed. Thanks in advance!
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 7:31 AM Artem S. Tashkinov <aros@....com> wrote:
>
> Commit 8318d6a6362f5903edb4c904a8dd447e59be4ad1 is not yet in 6.8.x stable.
>
> Please push.
>
> On 3/29/24 18:53, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 3/27/24 03:37, Artem S. Tashkinov wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> There's a new warning message in kernel 6.8 which I guess shouldn't be
> >> there. Linux 6.7 did not have it.
> >>
> >> No idea where it comes from:
> >>
> >> workqueue: name exceeds WQ_NAME_LEN. Truncating to:
> >> events_freezable_power_efficien
> >>
> >> A relevant bug report: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218649
> >>
> >> Please fix.
> >
> >
> > Tejun, should 8318d6a6362f5 be backported to 6.8? or maybe it has been already?
> >
> > Also, it look like Documentation/core-api/workqueue.rst needs to be updated
> > with the new workqueue name. Audra?
> >
> > thanks.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists