[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240403135205.7673001add2216e63db02d1e@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 13:52:05 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc: open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Regressions
<regressions@...ts.linux.dev>, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, linux-parisc
<linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>, Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, Mel Gorman
<mgorman@...hsingularity.net>, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>, Arnd Bergmann
<arnd@...db.de>, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, Anders Roxell
<anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: sh4: parisc: asm/cmpxchg.h:60:24: error: implicit declaration
of function 'cmpxchg_emu_u8' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 13:23:23 +0530 Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:
> The parisc and sh defconfig builds failed due to following build warnings
> and errors on Linux next-20240402.
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
>
> parisc:
> build:
> * gcc-11-tinyconfig - Failed
> * gcc-11-allnoconfig - Failed
> * gcc-11-defconfig - Failed
>
> sh:
> build:
> * gcc-11-defconfig - Failed
> * gcc-11-dreamcast_defconfig - Failed
> * gcc-11-tinyconfig - Failed
> * gcc-11-shx3_defconfig - Failed
> * gcc-11-allnoconfig - Failed
Is this a new failure? If so, can we please identify a suitable Fixes: target?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists