lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 13:57:11 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Michael Clark <michael@...aparadigm.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, 
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: user-space concurrent pipe buffer scheduler interactions

On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 at 13:52, Michael Clark <michael@...aparadigm.com> wrote:
>
> On 4/4/24 05:56, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 at 13:54, Michael Clark <michael@...aparadigm.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I am working on a low latency cross-platform concurrent pipe buffer
> >> using C11 threads and atomics.
> >
> > You will never get good performance doing spinlocks in user space
> > unless you actually tell the scheduler about the spinlocks, and have
> > some way to actually sleep on contention.
> >
> > Which I don't see you as having.
>
> We can work on this.

It's been tried.

Nobody ever found a use-case that is sufficiently convincing, but see
the write-up at

   https://lwn.net/Articles/944895/

for a pointer to at least attempts.

               Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ