[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ae3ea4bc-4a9c-416e-a593-2885fea96ae5@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 14:35:24 +0800
From: Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: wenjia@...ux.ibm.com, jaka@...ux.ibm.com
Cc: wintera@...ux.ibm.com, twinkler@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
gor@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com, svens@...ux.ibm.com, alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com,
tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v5 00/11] net/smc: SMC intra-OS shortcut with
loopback-ism
On 2024/3/24 21:55, Wen Gu wrote:
> This patch set acts as the second part of the new version of [1] (The first
> part can be referred from [2]), the updated things of this version are listed
> at the end.
> Change log:
>
> RFC v5->RFC v4:
> - Patch #2: minor changes in description of config SMC_LO and comments.
> - Patch #10: minor changes in comments and if(smc_ism_support_dmb_nocopy())
> check in smcd_cdc_msg_send().
> - Patch #3: change smc_lo_generate_id() to smc_lo_generate_ids() and SMC_LO_CHID
> to SMC_LO_RESERVED_CHID.
> - Patch #5: memcpy while holding the ldev->dmb_ht_lock.
> - Some expression changes in commit logs.
>
Hi, Jan. Do you have any comments on this version and should I post a new
patch series without 'RFC'? Thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists