[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zgz8yvj2gSNk-0KU@gaggiata.pivistrello.it>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 08:52:58 +0200
From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>
To: Alexandru Ardelean <alex@...uggie.ro>
Cc: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
adrien.grassein@...il.com, andrzej.hajda@...el.com,
neil.armstrong@...aro.org, rfoss@...nel.org,
Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, jonas@...boo.se,
jernej.skrabec@...il.com, airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch,
maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, mripard@...nel.org,
tzimmermann@...e.de, robh@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
stefan.eichenberger@...adex.com, francesco.dolcini@...adex.com,
marius.muresan@....ro, irina.muresan@....ro
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/bridge: lt8912b: add support for P/N pin swap
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 09:32:41AM +0300, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
> I did it like this, because I don't have a board with the P/N in the
You use this 'P/N' both here and in the binding document, to me this is
just too generic and confusing.
Just use some wording that people familiar with the topic can easily undestand,
the Lontium datasheet uses MIPI RX DP/DN, MIPI DSI DP/DN would also work fine
for me, or at least DP/DN that is the working used on some MIPI documentation.
This comment applies to both the changes in the driver and the binding.
Thanks,
Francesco
Powered by blists - more mailing lists