linux-kernel - [PATCH 19/34] sunrpc: suppress warnings for unused procfs functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed,  3 Apr 2024 10:06:37 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
	Anna Schumaker <anna@...nel.org>,
	Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@...app.com>,
	Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@...cle.com>,
	Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>,
	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 19/34] sunrpc: suppress warnings for unused procfs functions

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

There is a warning about unused variables when building with W=1 and no procfs:

net/sunrpc/cache.c:1660:30: error: 'cache_flush_proc_ops' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-const-variable=]
 1660 | static const struct proc_ops cache_flush_proc_ops = {
      |                              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/sunrpc/cache.c:1622:30: error: 'content_proc_ops' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-const-variable=]
 1622 | static const struct proc_ops content_proc_ops = {
      |                              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/sunrpc/cache.c:1598:30: error: 'cache_channel_proc_ops' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-const-variable=]
 1598 | static const struct proc_ops cache_channel_proc_ops = {
      |                              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

These are used inside of an #ifdef, so replacing that with an
IS_ENABLED() check lets the compiler see how they are used while
still dropping them during dead code elimination.

Fixes: dbf847ecb631 ("knfsd: allow cache_register to return error on failure")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
---
 net/sunrpc/cache.c | 10 +++-------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sunrpc/cache.c b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
index 95ff74706104..ab3a57965dc0 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/cache.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
@@ -1673,12 +1673,14 @@ static void remove_cache_proc_entries(struct cache_detail *cd)
 	}
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
 static int create_cache_proc_entries(struct cache_detail *cd, struct net *net)
 {
 	struct proc_dir_entry *p;
 	struct sunrpc_net *sn;
 
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROC_FS))
+		return 0;
+
 	sn = net_generic(net, sunrpc_net_id);
 	cd->procfs = proc_mkdir(cd->name, sn->proc_net_rpc);
 	if (cd->procfs == NULL)
@@ -1706,12 +1708,6 @@ static int create_cache_proc_entries(struct cache_detail *cd, struct net *net)
 	remove_cache_proc_entries(cd);
 	return -ENOMEM;
 }
-#else /* CONFIG_PROC_FS */
-static int create_cache_proc_entries(struct cache_detail *cd, struct net *net)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
-#endif
 
 void __init cache_initialize(void)
 {
-- 
2.39.2