linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: leds: add LED_FUNCTION

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <283b5056-29df-486f-8a4a-5271af8a5b8c@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 10:33:00 +0200
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To: Gergo Koteles <soyer@....hu>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
 Ike Panhc <ike.pan@...onical.com>,
 Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
 Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: leds: add LED_FUNCTION_FNLOCK

Hi George,

On 4/2/24 8:50 PM, Gergo Koteles wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> On Tue, 2024-04-02 at 20:08 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 02/04/2024 16:36, Gergo Koteles wrote:
>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>>
>>> On Tue, 2024-04-02 at 15:55 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Do we really need to define all these possible LED functions? Please
>>>> link to DTS user for this.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I think for userspace it's easier to support an LED with a specified
>>> name than to use various sysfs attributes. LED devices are easy to find
>>> because they available are in the /sys/class/leds/ directory.
>>> So I think it's a good thing to define LED names somewhere.
>>
>> You did not add anything for user-space, but DT bindings. We do not keep
>> here anything for user-space.
>>
> 
> The LED_FUNCTION_KBD_BACKLIGHT confused me. Ok, this shouldn't be here,
> I will remove it from v2.

I don't believe that is necessary, see my direct reply to Krzysztof first
email about this. According to Documentation/leds/leds-class.rst
you did exactly the right thing.

Also thank you for your interesting contribution. I have only briefly
looked over your other 2 patches, but I like the concept.

I'll hopefully have time to do a full review coming Monday.

Regards,

Hans