lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b4418ac1-10ba-4932-be6e-93282707024f@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 10:56:58 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
	Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
	Li Zetao <lizetao1@...wei.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	Luis de Arquer <luis.dearquer@...rtim.com>,
	Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>,
	Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>,
	Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>,
	Jaewon Kim <jaewon02.kim@...sung.com>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 31/34] spi: remove incorrect of_match_ptr annotations

On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 10:06:49AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> These appear to all be copied from the same original driver, so fix them at the
> same time by removing the unnecessary of_match_ptr() annotation. As far as I
> can tell, all these drivers are only actually used on configurations that
> have CONFIG_OF enabled.

Why are we not fixing of_match_ptr() here, or at least adding the ifdefs
in case someone does end up wanting to run without OF?

Just as a general thing for something like this where the patches aren't
expected to get merged together it makes life much easier to not send as
a series - pulling individual patches out of a series causes issues with
things like b4, especially if you have to apply them to multiple places,
and there's limited benefit.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ