[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b508ffe2-1346-4bd9-86e2-ea0df66387af@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 11:12:31 +0100
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, f.fainelli@...il.com,
sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
conor@...nel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.8 000/399] 6.8.3-rc1 review
Hi Greg,
On 01/04/2024 16:39, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.8.3 release.
> There are 399 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 03 Apr 2024 15:24:46 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.8.3-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.8.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
We have two test failures ...
Test results for stable-v6.8:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
116 tests: 114 pass, 2 fail
Linux version: 6.8.3-rc1-gbffeaccf18b5
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Test failures: tegra186-p2771-0000: pm-system-suspend.sh
tegra194-p2972-0000: boot.py
1. The system suspend regression appears to be a new regression from
v6.8.2 related to some workqueue changes and I have reported this
here [0].
2. The boot.py is a kernel warning that we observed with v6.8 and still
see with v6.9-rc2. There is a fix in the works and I am checking on
this [1]. This is not a regression for v6.8.y but a known issue.
Jon
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/stable/0cdbf4d6-3dce-42ee-8029-c486ec999fb5@nvidia.com/
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-tegra/73a71381-7c8c-4d0f-9fa4-3d9511c9bfbe@nvidia.com/T/#t
--
nvpublic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists