[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA8EJpohAe-aW1QqVkE9NBRU0DpZR7UiwdUKk6rS_YFAhenZZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 14:06:04 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@...cinc.com>
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, mturquette@...libre.com,
sboyd@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
djakov@...nel.org, quic_anusha@...cinc.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/5] clk: qcom: common: Add interconnect clocks support
On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 at 13:42, Varadarajan Narayanan
<quic_varada@...cinc.com> wrote:
>
> Unlike MSM platforms that manage NoC related clocks and scaling
> from RPM, IPQ SoCs dont involve RPM in managing NoC related
> clocks and there is no NoC scaling.
>
> However, there is a requirement to enable some NoC interface
> clocks for accessing the peripheral controllers present on
> these NoCs. Though exposing these as normal clocks would work,
> having a minimalistic interconnect driver to handle these clocks
> would make it consistent with other Qualcomm platforms resulting
> in common code paths. This is similar to msm8996-cbf's usage of
> icc-clk framework.
>
> Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@...cinc.com>
> ---
> v7: Restore clk_get
> v6: first_id -> icc_first_node_id
> Remove clock get so that the peripheral that uses the clock
> can do the clock get
> v5: Split changes in common.c to separate patch
> Fix error handling
> Use devm_icc_clk_register instead of icc_clk_register
> v4: Use clk_hw instead of indices
> Do icc register in qcom_cc_probe() call stream
> Add icc clock info to qcom_cc_desc structure
> v3: Use indexed identifiers here to avoid confusion
> Fix error messages and move to common.c
> v2: Move DTS to separate patch
> Update commit log
> Auto select CONFIG_INTERCONNECT & CONFIG_INTERCONNECT_CLK to fix build error
> ---
> drivers/clk/qcom/common.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/clk/qcom/common.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/common.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/common.c
> index 8b6080eb43a7..fa4ec89c04c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/common.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/common.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> #include <linux/regmap.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> +#include <linux/interconnect-clk.h>
> #include <linux/reset-controller.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
>
> @@ -252,6 +253,34 @@ static struct clk_hw *qcom_cc_clk_hw_get(struct of_phandle_args *clkspec,
> return cc->rclks[idx] ? &cc->rclks[idx]->hw : NULL;
> }
>
> +static int qcom_cc_icc_register(struct device *dev,
> + const struct qcom_cc_desc *desc)
> +{
> + struct icc_clk_data *icd;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTERCONNECT_CLK))
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (!desc->icc_hws)
> + return 0;
> +
> + icd = devm_kcalloc(dev, desc->num_icc_hws, sizeof(*icd), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!icd)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < desc->num_icc_hws; i++) {
> + icd[i].clk = devm_clk_hw_get_clk(dev, desc->icc_hws[i], "icc");
> + if (!icd[i].clk)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENOENT,
> + "(%d) clock entry is null\n", i);
> + icd[i].name = clk_hw_get_name(desc->icc_hws[i]);
> + }
> +
> + return devm_icc_clk_register(dev, desc->icc_first_node_id,
> + desc->num_icc_hws, icd);
> +}
> +
> int qcom_cc_really_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
> const struct qcom_cc_desc *desc, struct regmap *regmap)
> {
> @@ -327,7 +356,7 @@ int _qcom_cc_really_probe(struct device *dev,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - return 0;
> + return qcom_cc_icc_register(dev, desc);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(_qcom_cc_really_probe);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/common.h b/drivers/clk/qcom/common.h
> index 8657257d56d3..43073d2ef32a 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/common.h
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/common.h
> @@ -29,6 +29,9 @@ struct qcom_cc_desc {
> size_t num_gdscs;
> struct clk_hw **clk_hws;
> size_t num_clk_hws;
> + struct clk_hw **icc_hws;
Still we are passing hws here. We already have all the hws in a
different array. Can we just pass the indices?
> + size_t num_icc_hws;
> + unsigned int icc_first_node_id;
> };
>
> /**
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists