linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] gpiolib: Get rid of gpio_free_array()/gpio_request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMRc=Md_81qY02=XPmQA5_EWRC1eU0zYAjRwjbAGxvGg2kOL+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 13:09:13 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Alex Shi <alexs@...nel.org>, 
	Yanteng Si <siyanteng@...ngson.cn>, Hu Haowen <2023002089@...k.tyut.edu.cn>, 
	Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>, Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>, 
	Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] gpiolib: Get rid of gpio_free_array()/gpio_request_array()

On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 8:43 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 03:49:02PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > There are only two users left of the gpio_free_array()/gpio_request_array().
> > Convert them to very basic legacy APIs (it requires much less work for
> > now) and drop no more used gpio_free_array()/gpio_request_array().
>
> Any comments on this? We really want to get rid of the legacy APIs.
>

I applied the patches, they only touch the GPIO part in legacy
platform code. It's not very controversial IMO.

Bart