linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 02/10] perf/alibaba_uncore_drw: Avoid placing cpumask var on stack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240403125109.2054881-3-dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
Date: Wed,  3 Apr 2024 20:51:01 +0800
From: Dawei Li <dawei.li@...ngroup.cn>
To: will@...nel.org,
	mark.rutland@....com,
	yury.norov@...il.com,
	linux@...musvillemoes.dk
Cc: xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com,
	renyu.zj@...ux.alibaba.com,
	yangyicong@...ilicon.com,
	jonathan.cameron@...wei.com,
	andersson@...nel.org,
	konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	Dawei Li <dawei.li@...ngroup.cn>
Subject: [PATCH v2 02/10] perf/alibaba_uncore_drw: Avoid placing cpumask var on stack

For CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y kernel, explicit allocation of cpumask
variable on stack is not recommended since it can cause potential stack
overflow.

Instead, kernel code should always use *cpumask_var API(s) to allocate
cpumask var in config-neutral way, leaving allocation strategy to
CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK.

But dynamic allocation in cpuhp's teardown callback is somewhat problematic
for if allocation fails(which is unlikely but still possible):
- If -ENOMEM is returned to caller, kernel crashes for non-bringup
  teardown;
- If callback pretends nothing happened and returns 0 to caller, it may
  trap system into an in-consisitent/compromised state;

Use newly-introduced cpumask_any_and_but() to address all issues above.
It eliminates usage of temporary cpumask var in generic way, no matter how
the cpumask var is allocated.

Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@...ngroup.cn>
---
 drivers/perf/alibaba_uncore_drw_pmu.c | 10 +++-------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/perf/alibaba_uncore_drw_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/alibaba_uncore_drw_pmu.c
index a9277dcf90ce..d4d14b65c4a5 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/alibaba_uncore_drw_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/alibaba_uncore_drw_pmu.c
@@ -746,18 +746,14 @@ static int ali_drw_pmu_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
 	struct ali_drw_pmu_irq *irq;
 	struct ali_drw_pmu *drw_pmu;
 	unsigned int target;
-	int ret;
-	cpumask_t node_online_cpus;
 
 	irq = hlist_entry_safe(node, struct ali_drw_pmu_irq, node);
 	if (cpu != irq->cpu)
 		return 0;
 
-	ret = cpumask_and(&node_online_cpus,
-			  cpumask_of_node(cpu_to_node(cpu)), cpu_online_mask);
-	if (ret)
-		target = cpumask_any_but(&node_online_cpus, cpu);
-	else
+	target = cpumask_any_and_but(cpumask_of_node(cpu_to_node(cpu)),
+				     cpu_online_mask, cpu);
+	if (target >= nr_cpu_ids)
 		target = cpumask_any_but(cpu_online_mask, cpu);
 
 	if (target >= nr_cpu_ids)
-- 
2.27.0