linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 04/15] kunit: Add documentation for warning backtrace suppression API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed,  3 Apr 2024 06:19:25 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Maíra Canal <mcanal@...lia.com>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Daniel Diaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>,
	David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
	Arthur Grillo <arthurgrillo@...eup.net>,
	Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>,
	Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
	Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
	loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	x86@...nel.org,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 04/15] kunit: Add documentation for warning backtrace suppression API

Document API functions for suppressing warning backtraces.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
Acked-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
---
v2:
- Rebased to v6.9-rc1
- Added Tested-by:, Acked-by:, and Reviewed-by: tags
v3:
- Rebased to v6.9-rc2

 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
index 22955d56b379..8d3d36d4103d 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
@@ -157,6 +157,34 @@ Alternatively, one can take full control over the error message by using
 	if (some_setup_function())
 		KUNIT_FAIL(test, "Failed to setup thing for testing");
 
+Suppressing warning backtraces
+------------------------------
+
+Some unit tests trigger warning backtraces either intentionally or as side
+effect. Such backtraces are normally undesirable since they distract from
+the actual test and may result in the impression that there is a problem.
+
+Such backtraces can be suppressed. To suppress a backtrace in some_function(),
+use the following code.
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	static void some_test(struct kunit *test)
+	{
+		DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(some_function);
+
+		START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(some_function);
+		trigger_backtrace();
+		END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(some_function);
+	}
+
+SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT() returns the number of suppressed backtraces. If the
+suppressed backtrace was triggered on purpose, this can be used to check if
+the backtrace was actually triggered.
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(some_function), 1);
 
 Test Suites
 ~~~~~~~~~~~
@@ -857,4 +885,4 @@ For example:
 		dev_managed_string = devm_kstrdup(fake_device, "Hello, World!");
 
 		// Everything is cleaned up automatically when the test ends.
-	}
\ No newline at end of file
+	}
-- 
2.39.2