linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] gpiolib: Up to date the kernel documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Zg1XoiXTN3dQSNbB@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 16:20:34 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
	Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] gpiolib: Up to date the kernel documentation

On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 02:59:32PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 7:12 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > There are several issues:
> >
> > - Reference to the non-existing or only single functions out of possible
> >   callees
> >
> > - No return section
> >
> > $ scripts/kernel-doc -v -none -Wall drivers/gpio/gpiolib* 2>&1 | grep -w warning | wc -l
> > 67
> >
> > - Reference to NULL as %NULL in a few cases
> >
> > - Explicit reference to error codes as Exxx or %Exxx and
> >   numbers with leading %
> >
> > - Spelling of gpio, irq, SOC (in different capitalization)
> >
> > - Unaligned style of irqchip, gpiochip references
> >
> > - Unaligned style of NOTE, FIXME, and TODO
> >
> > Fix all these. While at it, fix multi-line comment style as well.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> Could you split it into separate patches by subject (one for
> capitalization, one for %NULL, etc.)? As is, it's a huge dump that's
> hard to review.

Sure.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko