lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 18:33:16 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	catalin.marinas@....com,
	will@...nel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	oliver.upton@...ux.dev,
	mark.rutland@....com,
	ryan.roberts@....com,
	apopple@...dia.com,
	rananta@...gle.com,
	yangyicong@...ilicon.com,
	v-songbaohua@...o.com,
	yezhenyu2@...wei.com,
	yihyu@...hat.com,
	shan.gavin@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: tlb: Fix TLBI RANGE operand

On Thu, 04 Apr 2024 11:26:20 +0100,
Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com> wrote:
> 
> In summary, we need 3 patches but the one fixing __TLBI_RANGE_NUM needs to be
> PATCH[1/3] so that it can be easily picked by stable kernel. PATCH[2/3] would
> be to improve __TLBI_VADDR_RANGE with masks. PATCH[3/3] will allow __flush_tlb_range_nosync()
> to do range-based TLB flush for MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES.

That's about it indeed.

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ