linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-msm: pervent access to suspended controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 21:42:43 +0300
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: Mantas Pucka <mantas@...vices.com>, Bjorn Andersson
 <andersson@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
 Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>, Pramod Gurav <pramod.gurav@...aro.org>,
 Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@...il.com>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 stable@...r.kernel.org, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
 Liming Sun <limings@...dia.com>,
 Victor Shih <victor.shih@...esyslogic.com.tw>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-msm: pervent access to suspended controller

On 28/03/24 16:20, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 27/03/24 17:17, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 at 11:25, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 21/03/24 16:30, Mantas Pucka wrote:
>>>> Generic sdhci code registers LED device and uses host->runtime_suspended
>>>> flag to protect access to it. The sdhci-msm driver doesn't set this flag,
>>>> which causes a crash when LED is accessed while controller is runtime
>>>> suspended. Fix this by setting the flag correctly.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>>>> Fixes: 67e6db113c90 ("mmc: sdhci-msm: Add pm_runtime and system PM support")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Mantas Pucka <mantas@...vices.com>
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
>>
>> Looks like this problem may exist for other sdhci drivers too. In
>> particular for those that enables runtime PM, don't set
>> SDHCI_QUIRK_NO_LED and don't use sdhci_runtime|suspend_resume_host().
>>
>> Don't know if there is a better way to address this, if not on a case
>> by case basis. Do you have any thoughts about this?
> 
> Yes probably case by case, but I will look at it.

There seem to be 3 that use runtime pm but not
sdhci_runtime_suspend_host():

1. dwcmshc_runtime_suspend() : only turns off the card clock
via SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL register, so registers are presumably
still accessible

2. gl9763e_runtime_suspend() : ditto

3. sdhci_tegra_runtime_suspend() : disables the functional
clock via clk_disable_unprepare(), so registers are presumably
still accessible

sdhci_msm_runtime_suspend() is different because it also turns
off the interface clock.

But it looks like there are no similar cases.