lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 10:07:27 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
 Krishna Kurapati <quic_kriskura@...cinc.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Thinh Nguyen
 <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 quic_ppratap@...cinc.com, quic_jackp@...cinc.com,
 Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 2/9] usb: dwc3: core: Access XHCI address space
 temporarily to read port info

On 04/04/2024 09:21, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 10:42:22AM +0530, Krishna Kurapati wrote:
>  
>> +static int dwc3_get_num_ports(struct dwc3 *dwc)
>> +{
>> +	void __iomem *base;
>> +	u8 major_revision;
>> +	u32 offset;
>> +	u32 val;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Remap xHCI address space to access XHCI ext cap regs since it is
>> +	 * needed to get information on number of ports present.
>> +	 */
>> +	base = ioremap(dwc->xhci_resources[0].start,
>> +		       resource_size(&dwc->xhci_resources[0]));
>> +	if (!base)
>> +		return PTR_ERR(base);
> 
> This is obviously still broken. You need to update the return value as
> well.
> 
> Fix in v20.

If one patchset reaches 20 versions, I think it is time to stop and
really think from the beginning, why issues keep appearing and reviewers
are still not happy.

Maybe you did not perform extensive internal review, which you are
encouraged to by your own internal policies, AFAIR. Before posting next
version, please really get some internal review first.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ