linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] scsi: ufs: Remove support for old UFSHCI versions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 10:45:23 +0200
From: Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>
To: Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>, "James E . J . Bottomley"
	 <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>, "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Bart Van Assche
 <bvanassche@....org>,  Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
 linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] scsi: ufs: Remove support for old UFSHCI versions

On Wed, 2024-03-27 at 09:17 +0200, Avri Altman wrote:
> UFS spec version 2.1 was published more than 10 years ago. It is
> vanishingly unlikely that even there are out there platforms that
> uses
> earlier host controllers, let alone that those ancient platforms will
> ever run a V6.10 kernel.  Thus, remove support of host controllers
> prior
> to UFS2.1.


> 
> This patch removes some legacy tuning calls that no longer apply.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>


Hi Avri, 

I think it's safe to remove support for UFS versions < UFS 2.1, but not
100% sure, let me check and give you a solid answer then.

Bean