linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 08/11] pinctrl: k210: Deprecate SOC_CANAAN and use SOC_CANAAN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 13:58:42 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Cc: Yangyu Chen <cyy@...self.name>, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, 
	Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, 
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, 
	Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, 
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, 
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/11] pinctrl: k210: Deprecate SOC_CANAAN and use SOC_CANAAN_K210

On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 2:58 PM Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochipcom> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 02:31:36PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 1:13 PM Yangyu Chen <cyy@...self.name> wrote:

> > Is this patch something I can just apply to the pinctrl tree?
>
> The new symbol doesn't exist in the pinctrl tree, so the driver will
> cease to be compilable. Yangyu sent a standalone version of these symbol
> changes:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/tencent_DB11214C8D0D7C48829ADA128E7BB8F13108@qq.com/
> That whole series needs to go through one tree though, for the same reason.

OK

> If your ack transfers to that (identical patch) I can take the whole lot
> via the soc tree for v6.10.

Yeah that's fine, go ahead.

Yours,
Linus Walleij