[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 14:01:58 +0200
From: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
To: Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>, Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Ajay Kaher <akaher@...are.com>, Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>,
Alexey Makhalov <amakhalov@...are.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
VMware PV-Drivers Reviewers <pv-drivers@...are.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/22] drivers/perf: riscv: Implement SBI PMU snapshot
function
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 01:04:35AM -0700, Atish Patra wrote:
..
> +static int pmu_sbi_snapshot_disable(void)
> +{
> + struct sbiret ret;
> +
> + ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_SNAPSHOT_SET_SHMEM, -1,
> + -1, 0, 0, 0, 0);
The "Rename the SBI_STA_SHMEM_DISABLE" patch should come before this
patch so SBI_SHMEM_DISABLE can be used instead of the -1's here.
Thanks,
drew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists