[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c3253f8a-e654-4016-b0c6-d92703107c48@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 17:53:26 +0200
From: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...hat.com>
To: Mikhail Kobuk <m.kobuk@...ras.ru>, Karol Herbst <kherbst@...hat.com>,
Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Francisco Jerez <currojerez@...eup.net>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lvc-project@...uxtesting.org, Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@...ras.ru>,
Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: nv04: Add check to avoid out of bounds access
On 3/31/24 08:45, Mikhail Kobuk wrote:
> Output Resource (dcb->or) value is not guaranteed to be non-zero (i.e.
> in drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bios.c, in 'fabricate_dcb_encoder_table()'
> 'dcb->or' is assigned value '0' in call to 'fabricate_dcb_output()').
I don't really know much about the semantics of this code.
Looking at fabricate_dcb_output() though I wonder if the intention was to assign
BIT(or) to entry->or.
@Lyude, can you help here?
Otherwise, for parsing the DCB entries, it seems that the bound checks are
happening in olddcb_outp_foreach() [1].
[1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bios.c#L1331
>
> Add check to validate 'dcb->or' before it's used.
>
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
>
> Fixes: 2e5702aff395 ("drm/nouveau: fabricate DCB encoder table for iMac G4")
> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Kobuk <m.kobuk@...ras.ru>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/dac.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/dac.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/dac.c
> index d6b8e0cce2ac..0c8d4fc95ff3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/dac.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/dac.c
> @@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ void nv04_dac_update_dacclk(struct drm_encoder *encoder, bool enable)
> struct drm_device *dev = encoder->dev;
> struct dcb_output *dcb = nouveau_encoder(encoder)->dcb;
>
> - if (nv_gf4_disp_arch(dev)) {
> + if (nv_gf4_disp_arch(dev) && ffs(dcb->or)) {
> uint32_t *dac_users = &nv04_display(dev)->dac_users[ffs(dcb->or) - 1];
> int dacclk_off = NV_PRAMDAC_DACCLK + nv04_dac_output_offset(encoder);
> uint32_t dacclk = NVReadRAMDAC(dev, 0, dacclk_off);
> @@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ bool nv04_dac_in_use(struct drm_encoder *encoder)
> struct drm_device *dev = encoder->dev;
> struct dcb_output *dcb = nouveau_encoder(encoder)->dcb;
>
> - return nv_gf4_disp_arch(encoder->dev) &&
> + return nv_gf4_disp_arch(encoder->dev) && ffs(dcb->or) &&
> (nv04_display(dev)->dac_users[ffs(dcb->or) - 1] & ~(1 << dcb->index));
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists