[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87le5r3gw7.fsf@mailhost.krisman.be>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 12:37:12 -0400
From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...e.de>
To: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...labora.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, tytso@....edu,
adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
jaegeuk@...nel.org, chao@...nel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...labora.com,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org, jack@...e.cz,
ebiggers@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 0/9] Cache insensitive cleanup for ext4/f2fs
Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...labora.com> writes:
> On 4/5/24 15:18, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 03:13:23PM +0300, Eugen Hristev wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am trying to respin the series here :
>>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/msg85081.html
>>
>> The subject here is "Cache insensitive cleanup for ext4/f2fs".
>> Cache insensitive means something entirely different
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cache-oblivious_algorithm
>>
>> I suspect you mean "Case insensitive".
>
> You are correct, I apologize for the typo.
Heh. I completely missed it in the previous submissions. I guess we both
just mentally auto-corrected.
Since we are here, I think I contributed to the typo in the cover letter
with the summary lines of patch 1 and 2. Differently from the rest of
the series, these two are actually working on a "cache of
casefolded strings". But their summary lines are misleading.
Can you rename them to:
[PATCH v16 1/9] ext4: Simplify the handling of cached casefolded names
[PATCH v16 2/9] f2fs: Simplify the handling of cached casefolded names
>From a quick look, the series is looking good and the strict mode issue
pointed in the last iteration seems fixed, though I didn't run it yet.
I'll take a closer look later today and fully review.
--
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists