linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] cxl/core: Fix initialization of mbox_cmd.size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 17:40:56 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>
CC: Kwangjin Ko <kwangjin.ko@...com>, <dave@...olabs.net>,
	<dave.jiang@...el.com>, <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>, <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
	<dan.j.williams@...el.com>, <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel_team@...ynix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] cxl/core: Fix initialization of
 mbox_cmd.size_out in get event

On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 09:04:16 -0700
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 05:14:03PM +0900, Kwangjin Ko wrote:
> > Since mbox_cmd.size_out is overwritten with the actual output size in
> > the function below, it needs to be initialized every time.
> > 
> > cxl_internal_send_cmd -> __cxl_pci_mbox_send_cmd
> > 
> > Problem scenario:
> > 
> > 1) The size_out variable is initially set to the size of the mailbox.
> > 2) Read an event.
> >    - size_out is set to 160 bytes(header 32B + one event 128B).
> >    - Two event are created while reading.
> > 3) Read the new *two* events.
> >    - size_out is still set to 160 bytes.
> >    - Although the value of out_len is 288 bytes, only 160 bytes are
> >      copied from the mailbox register to the local variable.
> >    - record_count is set to 2.
> >    - Accessing records[1] will result in reading incorrect data.  
> 
> Agree with the other comments on need to set .out_size when doing
> cxl_internal_send_cmd() in a loop. Poison list retrieval can hit
> this case if the MORE flag is set and a follow on read of the list
> delivers more records than the previous read. ie. device gives one
> record, sets the _MORE flag, then gives 5.
> 
> 2 other things appeared to me while looking at this:
> 
> First, it seems that there is another cleanup wrt accessing records
> with invalid data.  Still focusing on get_events and get_poison
> since those loop through output data based on a device supplied
> record count. The min_out check means the driver at least gets a
> count of records to expect. That's good. The problem occurs::
> 
> if (mbox.size_out != struct_size(payload, records, 'record_count'))
> 
> The driver will log garbage trace events, and that could lead to
> bad actions based on bad data. (like a needless scan of device based
> on a false overflow flag). So, checking that size.out is the proper
> multiple of record_count protects driver from bad device behavior.
> 
> I think that can be combined w the patch Dan is suggesting to
> reset mbox.size_out on each loop.
Hi Alison,

I'd split it.  Dan's one is a bug fix, this is hardening against
a device bug. Good to have but not really backport material unless
we think there are devices like this out there.

> 
> Second thing is the pci-driver quiet handling of PAYLOAD LENGTH
> values reported by the device. It seems like at a minimum the
> pci-driver could emit an info or debug message when the device
> is reporting payload lengths that exceed what the driver can
> copy in.

When does this happen?
1. New fields on end of a fixed length message.
   Correct to silently eat it as the spec is buggy if we don't
    have backwards compatibility.
    I don't think the spec has had that particular type of bug yet,
    but maybe I'm forgetting one.
2. Device bug.  Can't tell that is different from 1.

So maybe dev_dbg(). I'm not sure why the cxl-driver would ever want to
know.

> I'm referring to the mbox.size_out adjustment in
> __cxl_pci_mbox_send_cmd(). Or, if it's not the pci-drivers job
> to judge, pass that actual payload length value back in the
> mbox structure (new field) so that the cxl-driver can use it.
> The pci driver would still do it's "#8 Sanitize the copy" work,
> but it would allow the cxl-driver to clearly see why it got the
> .size_out it got, and squawk about it if needed.
> 
> --Alison
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kwangjin Ko <kwangjin.ko@...com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c b/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
> > index 9adda4795eb7..a38531a055c8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
> > @@ -958,13 +958,14 @@ static void cxl_mem_get_records_log(struct cxl_memdev_state *mds,
> >  		.payload_in = &log_type,
> >  		.size_in = sizeof(log_type),
> >  		.payload_out = payload,
> > -		.size_out = mds->payload_size,
> >  		.min_out = struct_size(payload, records, 0),
> >  	};
> >  
> >  	do {
> >  		int rc, i;
> >  
> > +		mbox_cmd.size_out = mds->payload_size;
> > +
> >  		rc = cxl_internal_send_cmd(mds, &mbox_cmd);
> >  		if (rc) {
> >  			dev_err_ratelimited(dev,
> > -- 
> > 2.34.1
> >