lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri,  5 Apr 2024 16:55:56 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com>, Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>, 
	Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 03/10] KVM: x86/pmu: Squash period for checkpointed events
 based on host HLE/RTM

Zero out the sampling period for checkpointed events if the host supports
HLE or RTM, i.e. supports transactions and thus checkpointed events, not
based on whether the vCPU vendor model is Intel.  Perf's refusal to allow
a sample period for checkpointed events is based purely on whether or not
the CPU supports HLE/RTM transactions, i.e. perf has no knowledge of the
vCPU vendor model.

Note, it is _extremely_ unlikely that the existing code is a problem in
real world usage, as there are far, far bigger hurdles that would need to
be cleared to support cross-vendor vPMUs.  The motivation is mainly to
eliminate the use of guest_cpuid_is_intel(), in order to get to a state
where KVM pivots on AMD vs. Intel compatibility, i.e. doesn't check for
exactly vendor==Intel except in rare circumstances (i.e. for CPU quirks).

Cc: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
index c397b28e3d1b..8c3564917953 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ static int pmc_reprogram_counter(struct kvm_pmc *pmc, u32 type, u64 config,
 	attr.sample_period = get_sample_period(pmc, pmc->counter);
 
 	if ((attr.config & HSW_IN_TX_CHECKPOINTED) &&
-	    guest_cpuid_is_intel(pmc->vcpu)) {
+	    (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_RTM) || boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HLE))) {
 		/*
 		 * HSW_IN_TX_CHECKPOINTED is not supported with nonzero
 		 * period. Just clear the sample period so at least
-- 
2.44.0.478.gd926399ef9-goog


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ