[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e70dc513-df9f-4b99-b9d9-7ebaf83e8f3e@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 09:12:01 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: gabriel.fernandez@...s.st.com, Michael Turquette
<mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v9 2/4] dt-bindings: stm32: update DT bingding for
stm32mp25
On 02/04/2024 14:53, gabriel.fernandez@...s.st.com wrote:
> From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...s.st.com>
>
> Now RCC driver use '.index' of clk_parent_data struct to define a parent.
> The majority of parents are SCMI clocks, then dt-bindings must be fixed.
>
> Fixes: b5be49db3d47 ("dt-bindings: stm32: add clocks and reset binding for stm32mp25 platform")
And except what Rob said, this does not look as a fix. How ABI break
could be a fix and what is even to fix here? Please describe the
observable bug, how it manifests itself and what is exactly the fix for
that bug.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists