linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] i2c: add HAS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 11:09:02 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, 
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] i2c: add HAS_IOPORT dependencies

Hi,

On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 04:33:51PM +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will disable inb()/outb() and friends at
> compile time. We thus need to add HAS_IOPORT as dependency for those
> drivers using them.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>

Basically OK, but I am asking this question since last June because I
couldn't find that information in changelogs:

In RFC v1, you agreed to drop PARPORT [1]. Is there a reason you haven't
done this so far?

[1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-i2c/patch/20211227164317.4146918-11-schnelle@linux.ibm.com/

Happy hacking,

   Wolfram


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)