linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] sched/fair: allow disabling sched_balance_newidle with sched_relax_domain

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3e2558cf-6b25-4e1b-92ab-a248cdf7b271@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 12:59:02 +0200
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
To: Vitalii Bursov <vitaly@...sov.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
 Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
 Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
 <bristot@...hat.com>, Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] sched/fair: allow disabling sched_balance_newidle
 with sched_relax_domain_level

On 05/04/2024 12:25, Vitalii Bursov wrote:
> 
> 
> On 05.04.24 12:17, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>> On 03/04/2024 15:28, Vitalii Bursov wrote:

[...]

>>>> ====== ===========================================================
>>>>   -1   no request. use system default or follow request of others.
>>>>    0   no search.
>>>>    1   search siblings (hyperthreads in a core).
>>>>    2   search cores in a package.
>>>>    3   search cpus in a node [= system wide on non-NUMA system]
>>>>    4   search nodes in a chunk of node [on NUMA system]
>>>>    5   search system wide [on NUMA system]
>>>> ====== ===========================================================
>>
>> IMHO, this list misses: 
>>
>>       2   search cores in a cluster.
>>
>> Related to CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER.
>> Like you mentioned, if CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER is not configured MC becomes
>> level=1.
> 
> Previous discussion in v2 on this topic:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/78c60269-5aee-45d7-8014-2c0188f972da@bursov.com/T/#maf4ad0ef3b8c18c8bb3e3524c683b6459c6f7f64

Sorry, I missed this discussion.

I thought that SCHED_CLUSTER is based on shared L3 tags (Arm64
kunpeng920) or L2 cache (X86 Jacobsville) so it's similar to SCHED_MC
just one level down?

> The table certainly depends on the kernel configuraion and describing this
> dependency in detail probably isn't worth it, so how the table should look
> like in the documentation is debatable...

[...]