linux-kernel - Re: [regression] 6.8.1 and 6.7.12: fails to hibernate with pm_runtime_force

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2181810.irdbgypaU6@lichtvoll.de>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 16:38:23 +0200
From: Martin Steigerwald <martin@...htvoll.de>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, regressions@...ts.linux.dev,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject:
 Re: [regression] 6.8.1 and 6.7.12: fails to hibernate with
 pm_runtime_force_suspend+0x0/0x120 returns -16

Greg KH - 05.04.24, 15:34:30 CEST:
> > I think ThinkPad T14 AMD Gen 1 or similar systems with Linux are not
> > that rare. I am surprised this is not hitting more people. Well maybe
> > it does and no one reported it here.
> > 
> > Well let's see what happens when 6.7.12 hits distribution kernels.
> > 
> > Anyway, I have an actionable git bisect between 6.7.11 and 6.7.12,
> > just not today. Maybe beginning of next week.
> 
> 6.7.y is end-of-life, I wouldn't worry too much about it, there's
> nothing we can do about it anymore, sorry.

Ah, I see. Thanks.

Still its a good short cut for bisection. Bisecting between 6.7.11 and 
6.7.12 should get much quicker results than bisecting between 6.7 and 6.8 
and as its the same error message in 6.8.1/6.8.4 and 6.7.12 it might be 
the same (backported) patch causing the issue.

-- 
Martin