[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5ecccc80-70b2-4c04-8c09-1113fef3e515@moroto.mountain>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 18:01:02 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>, linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] bcachefs: fix ! vs ~ typo in __clear_bit_le64()
The ! was obviously intended to be ~. As it is, this function does
the equivalent to: "addr[bit / 64] = 0;".
Fixes: 27fcec6c27ca ("bcachefs: Clear recovery_passes_required as they complete without errors")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
---
fs/bcachefs/util.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/util.h b/fs/bcachefs/util.h
index b7e7c29278fc..de639e8a3ab5 100644
--- a/fs/bcachefs/util.h
+++ b/fs/bcachefs/util.h
@@ -795,7 +795,7 @@ static inline void __set_bit_le64(size_t bit, __le64 *addr)
static inline void __clear_bit_le64(size_t bit, __le64 *addr)
{
- addr[bit / 64] &= !cpu_to_le64(BIT_ULL(bit % 64));
+ addr[bit / 64] &= ~cpu_to_le64(BIT_ULL(bit % 64));
}
static inline bool test_bit_le64(size_t bit, __le64 *addr)
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists