[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bbdb5c3c-1a2a-4fa3-8e08-2e1a3fc51b85@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 17:15:58 +0200
From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, Xuan Zhuo
<xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>, <nex.sw.ncis.osdt.itp.upstreaming@...el.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 1/7] netdev_features: remove unused
__UNUSED_NETIF_F_1
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 16:12:50 +0200
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 03:37:25PM +0200, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
>> NETIF_F_NO_CSUM was removed in 3.2-rc2 by commit 34324dc2bf27
>> ("net: remove NETIF_F_NO_CSUM feature bit") and became
>> __UNUSED_NETIF_F_1. It's not used anywhere in the code.
>> Remove this bit waste.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/netdev_features.h | 1 -
>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/netdev_features.h b/include/linux/netdev_features.h
>> index 7c2d77d75a88..44c428d62db4 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/netdev_features.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/netdev_features.h
>> @@ -14,7 +14,6 @@ typedef u64 netdev_features_t;
>> enum {
>> NETIF_F_SG_BIT, /* Scatter/gather IO. */
>> NETIF_F_IP_CSUM_BIT, /* Can checksum TCP/UDP over IPv4. */
>> - __UNUSED_NETIF_F_1,
>> NETIF_F_HW_CSUM_BIT, /* Can checksum all the packets. */
>> NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM_BIT, /* Can checksum TCP/UDP over IPV6 */
>> NETIF_F_HIGHDMA_BIT, /* Can DMA to high memory. */
>
> Are you sure this enum is not ABI?
Why should this be ABI? It's not a part of UAPI and Ethtool receives
these bits together with string names.
>
> It would be good to add an explanation why it is not ABI to the cover
> letter.
>
> Andrew
Thanks,
Olek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists