[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <cea58361-16bd-4daf-85eb-4d63d47cb46f@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2024 17:45:57 +0200
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Guenter Roeck" <linux@...ck-us.net>, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: "Andi Shyti" <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
"Wim Van Sebroeck" <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
"Heiner Kallweit" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"Wolfram Sang" <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
"Jarkko Nikula" <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
"Jean Delvare" <jdelvare@...e.de>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: i801: add I2C_MUX dependency
On Sat, Apr 6, 2024, at 15:08, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 04:27:43PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
>> index 1872f1995c77..2619018dd756 100644
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
>> @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ config I2C_HIX5HD2
>> config I2C_I801
>> tristate "Intel 82801 (ICH/PCH)"
>> depends on PCI
>> + depends on I2C_MUX || I2C_MUX_GPIO=n
>> select P2SB if X86
>> select CHECK_SIGNATURE if X86 && DMI
>> select I2C_SMBUS
>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
>> index 0b0df3fe1efd..4dfb3773e6e2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
>> @@ -1301,8 +1301,6 @@ config ITCO_WDT
>> select WATCHDOG_CORE
>> depends on I2C || I2C=n
>> depends on MFD_INTEL_PMC_BXT || !MFD_INTEL_PMC_BXT
>> - select LPC_ICH if !EXPERT
>> - select I2C_I801 if !EXPERT && I2C
>
> Sorry, I don't understand why LPC_ICH and I2C_I801 are neither a dependency
> nor need to be selected. What if both LPC_ICH=n and I2C_I801=n, or if one is
> selected but the other is needed to connect to the watchdog ?
The Kconfig dependencies are only required if there is a compile-time
dependencies. In this case, both LPC_ICH and I2C_I801 create a
platform device that is consumed by ITCO_WDT, but it could in
theory work with any other such driver providing the device.
It would be fine to make this explicit by adding
'depends on LPC_ICH || I2C_I801' to enforce that the watchdog
driver can only be selected on if at least one of these
is present, but we have a lot of examples where we don't
spell out this type of dependency.
The two 'select' statements in comparison a really bad idea
because a driver should never need to force-enable a user
visible symbol in another subsystem, and because no single
machine would actually require both the i810 and the ich driver.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists